The U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google's online monopoly continues to unfold, with Google vehemently defending its control over the widely used Chrome web browser . As Judge Amit Mehta prepares to make critical decisions about potentially dismantling Alphabet's empire, Google is pushing back against any attempts to separate Chrome from its other businesses. Chrome General Manager Parisa Tabriz testified that Chrome's deep integration with Google's infrastructure makes it impossible for any other company to manage it effectively without harming users. This defense raises questions about the extent of Google's dominance and whether its arguments hold water in the face of antitrust concerns. < The Interdependence Argument Parisa Tabriz argued that Chrome and Google have too many “interdependencies” to be separated without negatively impacting the bro...
All About What’s Next in Tech